A rather nice argument by Robert Sparrow (A Melbourne based bioethicist) suggests that the transhumanist arguments that human enhancement is a moral imperative imply that we ought to use reproductive technology to ensure that our children are female rather than male.
The core of the argument is that women have a significant number of advantages over men in terms of longevity etc and given that we could do without men (using IVF etc) then the pro-enhancement argument implies we ought to do so. Full article here:
Men on a slippery slide in future hermaphrodite world
Showing posts with label Reproductive Ethics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Reproductive Ethics. Show all posts
Friday, July 11, 2008
Female as a human enhancement?
Posted by
David Hunter
at
1:25 pm
4
comments
Labels: Human Enhancement, Reproductive Ethics
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



